Show all from recent

1. Topic to support Shohei Ohtani（360kview/695res） Free talk Yesterday 22:57
2. oozam (zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz)（110kview/507res） Free talk Yesterday 21:57
3. I'm not a Japanese citizen, but I would like to re...（621view/53res） Question Yesterday 19:26
4. studying abroad (usu. at university level)（68view/4res） Question Yesterday 19:25
5. Hide of Hide Shiatsu（2kview/36res） Question Yesterday 19:17
6. Hemorrhoid Treatment（63view/3res） Problem / Need advice Yesterday 18:46
7. Let's gather the elderly ！ ！（91kview/677res） Free talk Yesterday 11:00
8. Anything and everything related to travel to Japan...（371kview/4286res） Free talk 2024/06/06 21:04
9. Murmur Plus（116kview/3039res） Free talk 2024/06/05 13:23
10. About electronic pianos available at Costco in Jap...（436view/3res） Question 2024/06/04 13:25
Go back to top
Topic

U.S. Presidential Election 2020

Free talk
#1
  • 傍観だけでは終われなくなった3
  • mail
  • 2020/10/10 09:05

Here is an example of what Trump has actually done.

He has further reduced the estate tax bracket, which was only relevant to the top 0.2% of the very wealthy, and he himself has saved over $1 BILLION in taxes, and his original salary is $400,000 even though he is President without pay, so you can see what he is trying to accomplish with just one shot ？. He and his friends have also benefited greatly from the fact that he has lowered the income tax rate for large corporations and people who make over $500,000 a year.

To make up for the shortfall in revenue, he cut Medicare and food stamps, for example, and cut funding for various research programs, ignoring science. The disease control program that Obama created for things like the new coronas, Trump cut the budget and now we are in this mess.

Obamacare was just nullified with no alternative plan, and the insurance companies were left to do whatever they wanted. Those of us who already had business insurance and who were bought into the propaganda of the Republicans and their backers, the big insurance companies, that Obamacare was bad because of skyrocketing premiums, will realize how dangerous it is after this Corona.

The wall, which was originally ineffective, was built half-heartedly with taxpayer money, further increasing military spending and the national deficit, and it was a lie that Mexico was going to pay for it.

The failure of the anti-corona measures was also terrible, and in the midst of the spread of the infection, dozens of people were forced to work in meat factories by presidential decree, killing dozens of them. The forced reopening of schools and the economy is another example of putting the economy before human life.

While spouting conspiracy theories about mail-in ballot fraud, he has intentionally delayed the mail-in process by having the head of the USPS shaved down to his most ardent supporters, firing his entire executive staff, and forcing the removal of mail boxes and sorting machines. Some people died because they did not receive their medicines.

The BLM's peaceful demonstration rather defended the white supremacists and radical right who incited the riots and the Attorney General who tries to frame Antifa anyway, who of course Trump replaced with his predecessor. Furthermore, the military has even been deployed to suppress peaceful demonstrations=anti-Trump groups with unjustified arrests, tear gas attacks, and violence.

What he is doing is either to gain popularity among his supporters, or to deceive and harass his opponents for re-election, or to satisfy his desire for discrimination and revenge, or to benefit himself and his friends financially, or any of these. It is always.

Biden would have made a lot of money from his son getting favors from foreign countries. It seems like a normal possibility. But that kind of story is exactly the same thing with the Trump family. Both are self-serving blacks. Trump has been blatantly doing that kind of lobbying to collect money, and that is exactly ？ what he is talking about.

Trump's Republicans would do just about anything that would please their base of Christians, gun lovers, white supremacists, etc., in addition to favoring the wealthy and big business.

Biden Democrats, like Trump, will also give some preferential treatment to big business. They are both backers. But they will also do things that will please their supporters, such as the middle class and below and labor unions. That's probably the main difference between the two.

If you want to get away from the current domination of the wealthy and have politics for the common man, you have to increase the number of politicians like Sanders, AOC, SQUAD, Katie Porter, and others. These are all Democrats who do not take donations from big business.

Also, the Democratic takeover of the Senate is essential to eliminate the blasphemers of democracy who plan to take the presidential election, a referendum, to the Supreme Court, where they are sure to win, and settle it with nine members. It is also a good idea to donate to Senate candidates in states that are likely to flip.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#2680
  • 傍観だけでは終われなくなった3
  • 2020/12/10 (Thu) 09:20
  • Report

Correction:
We had to wait a little longer for the lawsuit filed by the State of Texas, as the Battle State side will first have some response by 3:00 p.m. today, followed by a motion from the Supreme Court. (If anything happens this week, Wisconsin ？ )

Response to the motion for leave to file a bill of complaint and to the motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order or, alternatively, for stay and administrative stay requested, due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm.

> The reaction of YouTube and others is too weird
The tightening of regulations could be considered rather in light of the 12/8 state finalization.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#2681
  • 金の亡者
  • 2020/12/10 (Thu) 09:20
  • Report

2657
> By the way,
if the Trump followers believe it will be overturned 100%,
they could make a fortune in a lifetime by having the Biden stocks crash, but did they put the money in ？


tax evasion and the stock stocks. I guess the chip argument is you too ？ lol I have a bigger problem with democracy being threatened first than money. You're getting off on the wrong foot, my friend. This is why the generation that has forgotten the war. They believe that freedom is always there, and they don't doubt it. The times are repeating themselves. This is a war against an invisible enemy.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#2682
  • 傍観だけでは終われなくなった3
  • 2020/12/10 (Thu) 09:27
  • Report

> I shouldn't bring up something that hasn't been settled ？
No. We paid a $25 Million settlement and covered it up well. It was a pretty dirty process. Just knowing the details of the lawsuits, you can see what a crook they are.

> The normal tallying process ？
with just the four of us, with no supervision, for hours, that's what the person in charge saw that video and explained that. And if the judge had seen the video and decided that it was not evidence of fraud, it would be much more unreasonable for an ignorant layman to make a fuss about "evidence of fraud" based on his/her imagination alone. If it really was fraud, why wasn't he arrested in the first place? ？ ？

> cases dismissed and that's it ？
No, I'm talking about the number of cases dismissed. Even in conservative judges.35 cases ？ Most of the cases just ended, WSJ wrote. I haven't dug further than that.

> I went to bed and woke up and it was all flipped
I know how you feel, but based on the percentage of mail-in ballots, it's a really obvious result ？

> Biden says he got the most votes ever
The correct term is "anti-Trump votes", and that would be extremely natural ？ since there were so many Trump votes.

> It's not just about mass fraud
You're completely shifting your argument ？ from talking about exposing the fraud that was going on.

The idea that we should win even if we have to force millions of votes to be invalidated by a conservative, Trump-friendly Supreme Court is now a complete abomination of democracy. ？ The fact that you are suing at this time after losing a system you knew about before the election is also justified. I think it's more normal to not feel justified. That's why they were ostensibly under the impression that there was evidence of mass vote fraud - and pretending that they were suing to expose the fraud. In fact, if the U.S. Supreme Court were to rule that millions of votes were simply invalidated, the justices would probably risk their lives. That's how unjustifiable it would be to public opinion. That is why I don't think it will happen. Even in light of the Pennsylvania example.

> Compared to that, a Trump win would definitely be better ？
No. I have written before that Trump is more personally broke and more likely to be manipulated by foreign powers.

> If you look at it from the perspective of "if Trump is right"
Then please give me some objective evidence or basis to at least give me some sense of "possibility of being right". Only if you can clear that up, I feel it's worthwhile to examine what you have to say.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#2683
  • ）
  • 2020/12/10 (Thu) 09:28
  • Report

＃ 2681
You have been fighting an invisible enemy for a long time.
You have only a few days left to finish this battle and be at ease. ？
This year is almost over.
Hang in there~ ！ ！

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#2702

> No. We paid a $25 Million settlement and covered it up well. It was a pretty dirty process. Oh, so the settlement is over. Sorry, I had no idea about that.


> It is much more unreasonable for an ignorant layman to make a fuss about "proof of fraud" based only on his imagination.
Ignorance may be true, but it is not fundamental that the rules of tallying require observers from both parties ？
It is obvious that tallying without observers is a fraud, but do you believe those in charge who say this is normal ？
Instead of denying everything President Trump does, why don't you just deny it? It seems to me that instead of denying everything Trump does, you seem to be affirming everything that is anti-Trump.
If you have someone who usually judges strange behavior as okay, it's not natural to consider him strange ？


> Most cases that are just over, WSJ wrote, though. I haven't dug further than that.
So you're saying that not a single case has been confirmed in which Trump's lawyers have declared that they're dropping the case.


> correctly, "the anti-Trump vote", and that would be extremely natural ？
No, I have no idea what is extremely natural.
I understand that you topicals hate Trump, but it's not extremely natural to hate him so much that you give him
the largest number of votes in history in four years when the economy is up, unemployment is down, and we haven't had a single war.
At least for me


> You're completely switching your argument ？ from talking about exposing the fraud that was happening.
I don't know if I'm switching ？
I think it's the same substance, because you're talking about getting people who passed laws that violate the Constitution to admit that there was fraud
ballots, voting methods, counting machines, software, tabulation methods, valid vote certification methods, and maybe more
A lot of fraudulent methods were used at once is what President Trump is saying, isn't it
Perhaps because it's ridiculous, I haven't read much of President Trump's claims ？


>millions The idea that you can force millions of votes to be invalidated and still win is now a complete desecration of democracy ？
From the other side, it means millions of votes were forced to be validated
If that were the case, you would try hard to invalidate them ？
.

> Then please give me objective evidence, evidence that at least gives me a small "chance of being right".
This is a tough one.
On the contrary, what would make you feel even the slightest "possibility of being right" ？?

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

Show all (1789)

Posting period for “ U.S. Presidential Election 2020 ”  has been closed.
Please create new topic to continue the same topic.

Report this topic
Go to top