Show all from recent

1. 緊急車両に道を譲らなかった場合の違反(271view/13res) 고민 / 상담 오늘 11:42
2. まさかトランプが勝つとは思わなかった。(1kview/42res) 프리토크 오늘 11:15
3. グリーンカードのための健康診断(162view/1res) 고민 / 상담 어제 17:39
4. 暗号資産(68view/1res) IT / 기술 어제 17:39
5. オレンジカウンティーの産婦人科(50view/0res) 고민 / 상담 어제 17:38
6. 日本旅行に関することは、何でもアリ、のトピ(674kview/4332res) 프리토크 2024/11/13 13:11
7. Palos Verdes パロスバーデスに住みたい(1kview/39res) 거주 2024/11/13 10:42
8. 冷蔵庫の移動と廃棄処理(6kview/73res) 프리토크 2024/11/12 16:34
9. 高齢者の方集まりましょう!!(264kview/862res) 프리토크 2024/11/12 16:22
10. ドジャーズのチケット(4kview/84res) 스포츠 2024/11/11 14:10
Topic

放射能物質がアメリカにも来る?

프리토크
#1
  • なっつ本物
  • 2011/03/14 12:50

10日くらいするとアメリカにも福島原発の放射能物質が偏西風にのってアメリカに到着すると言う記事を目にしました。若干薄まっているとは思いますが、かなり心配です。

#20
  • suica
  • 2011/03/16 (Wed) 15:42
  • Report

Japan Nuclear Update - British Embassyby Paul Atkinson on Tuesday, March 15, 2011 at 2:55am

I have just returned from a conference call held at the British Embassy in Tokyo. The call was concerning the nuclear issue in Japan. The chief spokesman was Sir. John Beddington, Chief Scientific Adviser to the UK Government, and he was joined by a number of qualified nuclear experts based in the UK. Their assessment of the current situation in Japan is as follows:



* In case of a 'reasonable worst case scenario' (defined as total meltdown of one reactor with subsequent radioactive explosion) an exclusion zone of 30 km would be the maximum required to avoid affecting peoples' health. Even in a worse situation (loss of two or more reactors) it is unlikely that the damage would be significantly more than that caused by the loss of a single reactor.



* The current 20km exclusion zone is appropriate for the levels of radiation/risk currently experienced, and if the pouring of sea water can be maintained to cool the reactors, the likelihood of a major incident should be avoided. A further large quake with tsunami could lead to the suspension of the current cooling operations, leading to the above scenario.



* The bottom line is that these experts do not see there being a possibility of a health problem for residents in Tokyo. The radiation levels would need to be hundreds of times higher than current to cause the possibility for health issues, and that, in their opinion, is not going to happen (they were talking minimum levels affecting pregnant women and children - for normal adults the levels would need to be much higher still).



* The experts do not consider the wind direction to be material. They say Tokyo is too far away to be materially affected.



* If the pouring of water can be maintained the situation should be much improved in time, as the reactors' cores cool down.



* Information being provided by Japanese authorities is being independently monitored by a number of organizations and is deemed to be accurate, as far as measures of radioactivity levels are concerned.



* This is a very different situation from Chernobyl, where the reactor went into meltdown and the encasement, which exploded, was left to burn for weeks without any control. Even with Chernobyl, an exclusion zone of 30 km would have been adequate to protect human health. The problem was that most people became sick from eating contaminated food, crops, milk and water in the region for years afterward, as no attempt was made to measure radioactivity levels in the food supply at that time or warn people of the dangers. The secrecy over the Chernobyl explosion is in contrast to the very public coverage of the Fukushima crisis.



* The Head of the British School asked if the school should remain closed. The answer was there is no need to close the school due to fears of radiation. There may well be other reasons - structural damage or possible new quakes - but the radiation fear is not supported by scientific measures, even for children.



* Regarding Iodine supplementation, the experts said this was only necessary for those who had inhaled quantities of radiation (those in the exclusion zone or workers on the site) or through consumption of contaminated food/water supplies. Long term consumption of iodine is, in any case, not healthy.



The discussion was surprisingly frank and to the point. The conclusion of the experts is that the damage caused by the earthquake and tsunami, as well as the subsequent aftershocks, was much more of an issue than the fear of radiation sickness from the nuclear plants.

#21
  • 再生
  • 2011/03/16 (Wed) 16:34
  • Report

いい加減にしてくれませんか?
あなた達は外国にいるからいいでしょうけど、今、日本がどういう状態だか、わかってないようですね。
あなた方が騒ぐ放射能の話題が一人歩きして、被災地は完全に孤立しています。近付けるのは政府関係の車両だけです。
これがどういうことか、わかりますか?

あなた方が善意で送った民間物資や義援金が、現地に届いていません!

勿論、被災地以北と以西も完全に遮断されています。ガソリンがないせいもありますが、そんなに怖がりたいならひとりで勝手に怖がっててください。させたいんなら頭の中で何回人類滅亡させて頂いても構いませんから。

今、テレビで、在日パキスタン人の方がパキスタン・カレーの炊き出しをしているシーンが出ました。「暖かいものは久しぶり」とみんな喜んでいます。仙台市場ではセリが再開されたそうです。

#22
  • juliansean
  • 2011/03/16 (Wed) 17:57
  • Report

これを読めば 報道がいかにコントロールされているかがわかります。

http://blog.livedoor.jp/koki_uchiyama/archives/1281312.html

#23

#22、コントロールされてこれか?ザルコントロールだな。

#24

#2のサイト理解できなかったのでまとめ。

「私は原発反対運動家ではありません」
「北陸電力能登(現・志賀)原発差し止め裁判原告特別補佐人、
東北電力女川原発差し止め裁判原告特別補佐人、
福島第2原発3号機運転差し止め訴訟原告証人」
「私自身が二〇年近く、現場の責任者として、働く人にオウムの麻原以上のマインド・コントロール、「洗脳教育」をやって来ました。何人殺したかわかりません。」
「私はこのような仕事を長くやっていて、毎日がいたたまれない日も多く、夜は酒の力をかり、酒量が日毎に増していきました。そうした自分自身に、問いかけることも多くなっていました。一体なんのために、誰のために、このようなウソの毎日を過ごさねばならないのかと。」

洗脳教育をやって、人を殺し、アル中で、嘘つき。
原発反対はしてないけど、原発に反対して差し止めを訴えている人の補佐ではある。

やっぱり理解不能。

Posting period for “ 放射能物質がアメリカにも来る? ”  has been closed.
Please create new topic to continue the same topic.