Vivinavi : Los Angeles : (United States) Los Angeles

• 傍観だけでは終われなくなった3
• 2021/05/25 (Tue) 12:07
• Report

> No information retrieved ＝ baseless lie
there is no evidence to say "it's just a common cold and can be taken lightly" when there are government statistics showing over 620,000 people have died.

> There is no clinical trial data
There is data on the number of patients. That's why Japan started to approve it. What we don't have is data from a few years later.

> There was no 1% difference in infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated
The vaccine is given to hedge the risk of seriousness after infection, not to prevent infection.

> There is no doubt that he is delusional, mistaken, and ignorant
There is no doubt that he is delusional, mistaken, and ignorant.

> There is no pessimistic option to strike now.
Typical statement from a narrow minded person who speaks without fundamental understanding that his situation does not = the world's situation.

> The difference in vaccine thinking indicates a person's fundamental thought process
This is true.

Even if you refuse to vaccinate, if you are dealing with someone who is obsessed with stale conspiracy theories full of contradictions, I would refrain from associating with them. This group tends to disregard the new coronas with narrow and shallow ideas, and also deny masks and close avoidance. Many of them are politically and ideologically incomprehensible for the rest of their lives, but the presence or absence of a mask is a highly accurate barometer, so it is easy to understand.

• 結論
• 2021/05/25 (Tue) 13:02
• Report

> I'm hitting it to hedge the risk of serious illness after infection, not for prevention of infection.

No, it is intended to be effective for both prevention of infection and serious illness. At least they are not claiming that it is ineffective in preventing infection.
Whether 1% of prevention of infection is considered a lot or a little depends on the population.
The idea may be that if 1 billion people are targeted, even 1% would be effective for 10 million people, so it would be a good measure, but since 99% of people are not infected whether they are or not, there is no data on long-term side effects. However, since 99% of people will not be infected even if they are not given the vaccine, there is little need for an "unapproved" vaccine with no data on long-term side effects to be given immediately.
If the vaccine is officially approved and long-term data are available, then of course vaccination is possible.

• は？
• 2021/05/25 (Tue) 21:43
• Report

>> You don't have the knowledge to say that diseases that have occurred over time are not related to vaccines
You don't even know the basics of a business that works to improve a defective product because they won't use it due to trust issues. I am talking about the example of vaccines in the past.


It is quite unintelligible. In the first place, I don't understand how you can equate a vaccine with a business product defect in the same way. We are talking about the impossibility of relating any future health problems to vaccines. I'm not talking about whether or not it will improve in the future, but rather the fact that they are rushing to semi-compel people to take a new type of vaccine that has the risk of not being approved by the FDA, which is frightening.

• は？
• 2021/05/25 (Tue) 21:48
• Report

>> I can't believe what the moneyed powers that be are saying
because no one is saying that they will compensate for any inconvenience that may occur in the future. In the first place, you don't know the difference between a company's improvement efforts and compensation, and your paranoid brain that links everything to conspiracy theories is too much.


Yes.
Nobody is talking about that. You're talking about corporate efforts to improve and you're so far off base that you've already lost the story ？ You're fundamentally off base in your perspective. Corporate efforts are at the level of a salaryman who has just learned his job and is looking at it from above. You will always be an ordinary employee.

• 当たり前だ。
• 2021/05/25 (Tue) 22:02
• Report

You are a hardcore slave thinker.

Don't depend on that, work. What is the value of a person who doesn't work but lives on taxpayer money. After all, there are even people who commit crimes. The tax rate will only go up as more and more immigrants from poorer and poorer countries come to depend on it. It is ridiculous to work and pay taxes, and those with low incomes just live uselessly at the bottom, taking advantage of the government's guarantees.

You want to be a slave to a few powerful people ？ ？ Trump is the only president who worked for the people to increase the number of working and motivated people. The Democrats just seem to be reaching out to the weak, but you have no idea how they want to motivate the people, increase the weak, and ultimately keep them under their control. Well, they're so manic and vaccinated that they won't realize that they are slaves to modern society until they die.