Show all from recent

191. wholesale（1kview/3res） Question 2023/05/30 14:50
192. Parking near LAX（960view/4res） Question 2023/05/24 13:49
193. Volunteer Activities（1kview/6res） Problem / Need advice 2023/05/23 14:12
194. Taipei Airport（392view/0res） Other 2023/05/23 10:47
195. Children's Lessons（1kview/13res） Question 2023/05/23 07:56
196. Cell phone when returning to Japan（11kview/53res） Question 2023/05/17 16:56
197. I plan to study abroad for a month. Please give me...（6kview/35res） Free talk 2023/05/17 06:58
198. Sawtelle Japan Institute or Polaris Institute（1kview/2res） Question 2023/05/13 15:29
199. Senior Benefit Cards（3kview/15res） Question 2023/05/12 18:05
200. Those who are willing to teach Shopyfy.（367view/0res） Learn / School 2023/05/09 11:18
Go back to top
Topic

U.S. Presidential Election 2020

Free talk
#1
  • 傍観だけでは終われなくなった3
  • mail
  • 2020/10/10 09:05

Here is an example of what Trump has actually done.

He has further reduced the estate tax bracket, which was only relevant to the top 0.2% of the very wealthy, and he himself has saved over $1 BILLION in taxes, and his original salary is $400,000 even though he is President without pay, so you can see what he is trying to accomplish with just one shot ？. He and his friends have also benefited greatly from the fact that he has lowered the income tax rate for large corporations and people who make over $500,000 a year.

To make up for the shortfall in revenue, he cut Medicare and food stamps, for example, and cut funding for various research programs, ignoring science. The disease control program that Obama created for things like the new coronas, Trump cut the budget and now we are in this mess.

Obamacare was just nullified with no alternative plan, and the insurance companies were left to do whatever they wanted. Those of us who already had business insurance and who were bought into the propaganda of the Republicans and their backers, the big insurance companies, that Obamacare was bad because of skyrocketing premiums, will realize how dangerous it is after this Corona.

The wall, which was originally ineffective, was built half-heartedly with taxpayer money, further increasing military spending and the national deficit, and it was a lie that Mexico was going to pay for it.

The failure of the anti-corona measures was also terrible, and in the midst of the spread of the infection, dozens of people were forced to work in meat factories by presidential decree, killing dozens of them. The forced reopening of schools and the economy is another example of putting the economy before human life.

While spouting conspiracy theories about mail-in ballot fraud, he has intentionally delayed the mail-in process by having the head of the USPS shaved down to his most ardent supporters, firing his entire executive staff, and forcing the removal of mail boxes and sorting machines. Some people died because they did not receive their medicines.

The BLM's peaceful demonstration rather defended the white supremacists and radical right who incited the riots and the Attorney General who tries to frame Antifa anyway, who of course Trump replaced with his predecessor. Furthermore, the military has even been deployed to suppress peaceful demonstrations=anti-Trump groups with unjustified arrests, tear gas attacks, and violence.

What he is doing is either to gain popularity among his supporters, or to deceive and harass his opponents for re-election, or to satisfy his desire for discrimination and revenge, or to benefit himself and his friends financially, or any of these. It is always.

Biden would have made a lot of money from his son getting favors from foreign countries. It seems like a normal possibility. But that kind of story is exactly the same thing with the Trump family. Both are self-serving blacks. Trump has been blatantly doing that kind of lobbying to collect money, and that is exactly ？ what he is talking about.

Trump's Republicans would do just about anything that would please their base of Christians, gun lovers, white supremacists, etc., in addition to favoring the wealthy and big business.

Biden Democrats, like Trump, will also give some preferential treatment to big business. They are both backers. But they will also do things that will please their supporters, such as the middle class and below and labor unions. That's probably the main difference between the two.

If you want to get away from the current domination of the wealthy and have politics for the common man, you have to increase the number of politicians like Sanders, AOC, SQUAD, Katie Porter, and others. These are all Democrats who do not take donations from big business.

Also, the Democratic takeover of the Senate is essential to eliminate the blasphemers of democracy who plan to take the presidential election, a referendum, to the Supreme Court, where they are sure to win, and settle it with nine members. It is also a good idea to donate to Senate candidates in states that are likely to flip.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#42
  • SHICK
  • 2020/10/15 (Thu) 09:18
  • Report

＞ On November 10, after the election, the Supreme Court will decide whether to repeal Obamacare's greatest benefit, a policy that prohibited insurance companies from canceling, refusing to renew ＞, or changing coverage at will in the event that the policy holder should become ill.

Please provide a source for this.
Otherwise, it seems to me that you've been writing about this for a long time, and it's your own conjecture.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#43
  • ダンプトランプ
  • 2020/10/15 (Thu) 09:22
  • Report

Trump made a pledge to appoint China as a currency manipulator on the first day he was elected, but he ended up leaving it alone.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#44
  • 傍観だけでは終われなくなった3
  • 2020/10/15 (Thu) 09:56
  • Report

\모듈을 내(I'm reposting this with the source added at the end. \cHB9D063}
On 11/10 after the election, the Supreme Court will decide whether to repeal Obamacare's biggest benefit, the policy that prohibited insurance companies from canceling, refusing to renew, or changing coverage at will if the policy holder gets sick.

The Trump Republicans have been quietly shooing this stuff away, and now the policy will be repealed.

20 million people will lose their insurance because of this repeal. It will also have a major impact on Medicare, Medicaid, prescription drugs, etc.

Again, I would like to warn anyone who has been reading ignorant posts like "Obamacare is to protect the poor" that the only people who will lose insurance because of this change are those who are income-eligible. The people who will lose their insurance because of this change are people with illnesses, regardless of income. They are the ones who should be the ones who need insurance the most ？

Everyone has been paying high premiums for insurance in case they get sick, but when they get sick, they are thrown out at will by the insurance companies to ensure their profits, which is a complete reversal of the original system. ？

Of course, the insurance company executives will be able to make money again as before, and the Republicans will benefit from the large amount of political donations they will receive from their bubbling money.

This policy was absolutely necessary and valuable even for those in the $200-300,000 a year class, not just the poor. Many people may not realize it, but the health care system in this country allows anyone to bankrupt themselves with one major illness.

I would understand if Trump would come up with an alternative, but he spent 4 years and came up with nothing. Just destroying the protection policy for the people by Obamacare.

"For the middle class and below in CA, Trump has really done nothing but harm." for example.

But in this case, even if your income is in the top 1%\ ($400,000 to $500,000 a year), you are not at all in a safe area where you can afford to avoid bankruptcy, but rather on the side that needs this protection policy, so it is correctly "only harm for 99% of people".

#42
Example source above.
Google around "aca pre existing conditions supreme court" and you'll find a lot.

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/usc-brookings-schaeffer-on-health-policy/2020/10/13/a-supreme-court-decision-to-strike-down-the-aca-would-create-chaos-in-the-health-care-system/

https://www.nytimes.com/article/supreme-court-obamacare-case.html

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#45
  • トランプ再選11
  • 2020/10/15 (Thu) 10:29
  • Report

I heard that one company is paying so much for health insurance that the company won't cover their employees.　The policy is now to buy insurance individually, and I heard that one employee pays ＄ 600 per month, and a family of 3 pays $ 1500+ per month.　　Earlier, there was a tobi on Vivinavi about the high Obama premiums.　With today's health care, if you go into the hospital in an ambulance, the doctor is obligated to treat patients without insurance, so it's ridiculous to pay a decent amount for insurance, if you know what I mean. When I read the international student's bill for treatment, it said on the back that those with insurance should go to their insurance company, and those whose insurance doesn't cover it should pay for it themselves, and those without insurance don't have to pay for it, so they should bill the county, etc. I was astonished to see a bill from a private hospital that clearly covered the uninsured.　If this is the kind of Obama insurance I want, I don't want it.　　It is a Republican Trump administration that can eliminate this discrepancy.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#46
  • 傍観だけでは終われなくなった3
  • 2020/10/15 (Thu) 11:23
  • Report

#45
> Health insurance premiums are too high
They were high even before Obama and are being raised every year. See #39

> Because doctors are obligated to treat patients without insurance,
this was also the case before Obama, and Obama did nothing in particular.

> Private hospital bills that cover the uninsured
There were too many uninsured, which is why Obamacare made it mandatory to enroll.

> It is the Republican Trump administration that can eliminate this contradiction
No, quite the opposite.

Trump just made more uninsured people like before, and it's been 4 years without a single decent alternative.

What you wrote is a mess from 1 to 10, are you ok ？

Also, why are Trump Republicans trying to get the Supreme Court to repeal "policies that protect people from being cancelled by their insurance companies if they get sick"? ？ Who and what for ？ ？

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

Show all (1789)

Posting period for “ U.S. Presidential Election 2020 ”  has been closed.
Please create new topic to continue the same topic.

Report this topic
Go to top