Vivinavi : Los Angeles : (United States) Los Angeles

• ソースしょうゆ
• 2023/01/15 (Sun) 08:41
• Report

Any source the government puts out is a manipulated piece of information. If the cause of death is anything positive for corona, just say it's all corona, don't you remember what the WHO did ？.

• へい
• 2023/01/15 (Sun) 21:16
• Report

＞ If the cause of death is positive for corona of any kind, we can just call it all corona
and that's right. And it was the same last year, the year before, and still is （ Strictly speaking, they now exclude immediate deaths from accidents, as expected ）.
To put that in perspective, the number of deaths among the elderly is 16 times higher than in the same period last year.

#66, source ？. You don't need to search for it, it will be reported in the daily news.
But the difference between the affirmative and the negative is that the affirmative says it's because I didn't take that thing more than three times; the negative says it's because I took it more than three times.
And from the various data we have, it seems that the naysayers are right.

• エビデンス
• 2023/01/16 (Mon) 07:40
• Report

○ We request that all persons who are positive for novel coronavirus infection and who died while hospitalized or under medical care be published as "deaths", regardless of the exact cause of death.
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/000641629.pdf

• どうでもいい
• 2023/01/16 (Mon) 16:43
• Report

Positive ・ Negative

I'm bored

• へい
• 2023/01/16 (Mon) 18:04
• Report

No, it would be important.
If the mortality rate is higher for those who have had only two doses, then we should have a third dose, and if it is higher for those who have had more than three doses, then we should stop having them.
Then the question is, if the data is available, why is it not made public?

• 昭和のおとっつぁん
• 2022/11/24 (Thu) 10:34
• Report

Donate them to a recycle store.

• 団塊
• 2022/11/24 (Thu) 16:18
• Report

Showa

You seem to believe that recycling and solar power （ renewable energy ） is earth friendly （ eco ） ・ ・ ・. I'm skeptical.

* Anything that costs more is not eco-friendly.

Solar power is expensive to build and inefficient （ and unstable ）. So it is expensive anyway. In other words, it costs that much energy. It is not eco-friendly. （ That's why they are not popular, so they manage to reduce the price with subsidies. ）

* Recycling is the same.

The traditional recycling business is eco-friendly. Reusing scrap iron, collecting cardboard, collecting liquor bottles, etc. is a viable business and does not require subsidies. They do not use energy. Eco-friendly.
Recycling businesses that businesses do not want to do are not cost-effective, but the government subsidizes them and pretends to force them to do so. It is not eco-friendly because it uses so much energy.

In short, cheap is eco. In terms of cars, it is cheap used cars. In power generation, it is coal-fired power.
Natural economy is the best.

• 昭和のおとっつぁん
• 2022/11/24 (Thu) 16:19
• Report

Whether it's broken or junk, bring it in and they will take it back.
They fix broken refrigerators, TVs, etc. and sell them cheaply in the store.

• 倍金万
• 2022/12/06 (Tue) 09:17
• Report

Lately it has been raining a lot and I haven't been able to do any walking.

Not to make up for it, I started taking yoga classes at LA Fitness

in addition to aerobics. But I can't bend my body at all,

but it's better than not doing it.

• 団塊
• 2022/12/13 (Tue) 14:40
• Report

I'm looking at Facebook and there are a number of posts like the following and I have to put in a lot of information here... ？ Can I trust you ？

Qualify for 8 COVID-19 tests each month! If you just enrolled in Medicare, you may be eligible to receive 8 COVID-19 tests per month at no cost to you. Sign up now and start receiving your tests each month directly to your home.