Select [Question]

1. Divorce in Los Angeles(3kview/18res) Question Yesterday 12:47
2. How to visit the Natural History Museum in Los Ang...(1kview/80res) Question 2024/05/05 11:07
3. Reliable auto repair shop(1kview/51res) Question 2024/05/05 10:55
4. Children's Restrooms on the Go(464view/4res) Question 2024/05/05 10:42
5. Hide of Hide Shiatsu(2kview/34res) Question 2024/04/16 12:39
6. Shipping Liquor to Japan(3kview/24res) Question 2024/04/11 13:39
7. Seasonings for hypertension(477view/4res) Question 2024/03/30 18:04
8. Do you have trouble with private sales?(4kview/30res) Question 2024/03/19 20:33
9. A food cart noodle shop, then(8kview/78res) Question 2024/03/15 13:49
10. Regarding Resident Registration in Japan(1kview/22res) Question 2024/03/01 14:35
Topic

Apartment eviction: 、、、、

Question
#1
  • WATERS
  • mail
  • 2023/01/09 19:24

Nice to meet you.


I am currently in LA, and I heard a rumor from a neighbor that the owner is putting his property up for sale and the current residents may be evicted.

I have lived in my current apartment for about 10 years, do I have to comply with these evictions?

I also heard that you can get some "eviction fee" for eviction, but I doubt it.


I am wondering if it would be better to consult a lawyer or something and proceed, but

if anyone has had this experience, I would appreciate some feedback.


Thank you.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#2
  • 貧乏は辛い
  • 2023/01/09 (Mon) 19:45
  • Report

Lawyers are expensive, but okay ? ?
those without money won't be able to live in California
just saying.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#3

If you're putting your property up for sale, you'd have to comply with being evicted ?
If there's another buyer and the owner takes over, the previous occupants would have to leave. If they're going to do construction or renovations on the room or something, I can charge them for lodging and eviction until the renovations are done. I've heard that if you're evicted for the landlord's own reasons, you have to pay the tenant enough money to live in the room for a couple of months.  I did a lot of research because I once almost got evicted because the landlord couldn't raise the rent and wanted to evict all the previous tenants and rent the place out at a new, drastically increased rent.
They harassed me so much for wanting me to leave that another roommate sued and somehow managed to keep me from being evicted.

But I thought I had to leave if I wanted to sell.
Even if you live there and say you don't intend to leave
you can't sell a house where people live.
Of course.
I understand you don't want to move out now after living there for 10 years...

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#4
  • 昭和のおとっつぁん
  • 2023/01/10 (Tue) 06:30
  • Report

# I heard a rumor that you are putting your property up for sale and the current residents may be evicted.
If you put the apartment up for sale, for what reason would the residents be evicted
I need to know so I can move on.
Do you live in that apartment?

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#5
  • 平成のおにぃやん
  • 2023/01/10 (Tue) 07:38
  • Report

Seriously …

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#7
  • かりな
  • 2023/01/10 (Tue) 08:30
  • Report

I have an acquaintance who was in a situation a little similar to that of Topy's.
He lived in the same apartment for 10 years, but one day the apartment was sold and after a while it was bought out.
The new owner wanted to put his family and relatives in the apartment, so he gave the tenants an unreasonable rent increase, which in effect made them move out.
(Rent control-wise, not sure.... )
An acquaintance was going to return to Japan permanently in a few more years, and the rent was raised because moving would be a hassle, but the acquaintance stayed on.
Depending on the rent, he could continue to live there as is....

The management company of my apartment changed about 2 years ago, and I think they were conscientious before, but then the rent kept being raised... cry
I'm not sure about the legalities here either, but I've lived here for 5 years and $ they raised the rent by about 500...

Sorry for the off-topic comment.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#8
  • MAGAの悪法で移民撃激減ー人手不足ー賃金インフレー物価高騰
  • 2023/01/10 (Tue) 10:40
  • Report

I know someone who bought a small 4-family apartment property, and he said he had to pay about $30,000 to evict his family right away because he wanted to get them done.
My apartment has not had a rent increase for 10 years, but 4 years ago it was moved from an individual to a management company and every year they raise the rent by 10%, which is just barely legal in California.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#9
  • 昭和のおとっつぁん
  • 2023/01/10 (Tue) 11:33
  • Report

It is common for the management company to change
terms and conditions if they cannot be agreed upon in order to have the apartment managed.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#10
  • 不運
  • 2023/01/10 (Tue) 12:37
  • Report

You don't have a vacancy fee unless you have rent control. If there is, you get it. The next owner might keep the tenant, or the current owner might evict and sell. If that happens, you have no choice but to leave. Don't think you'll get the money right away. I'll look for the next place.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#11
  • ワクチン義務化
  • 2023/01/10 (Tue) 12:39
  • Report
  • Delete

If the contract is for a month-to-month, you have no rights.
If it's an eviction within the term of the contract, you can negotiate, maybe get a month's rent ?.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#12
  • 昭和のおとっつぁん
  • 2023/01/10 (Tue) 15:27
  • Report

The move-out fee is determined by each tenant negotiating with the owner.
The negotiations are never divulged to anyone else, but a note is added.

A 2-bed tenant in an apartment I knew got $70,000 to move out.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#13
  • 引越
  • 2023/01/10 (Tue) 17:58
  • Report

Whenever I see a Toby like this, it's always this story

The residence is in a state of renting and meeting eviction at any moment. Big mistake to think that everything is permanent.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#15
  • 昭和のおとっつぁん
  • 2023/01/11 (Wed) 08:40
  • Report

14
It doesn't matter if you're lying, because you don't live there. 
You should be living in an apartment where you can get an eviction fee.

You could receive $70,000 eviction fee
The lawyer will go between you and the tenants of that apartment and ask each one of them what they want to do.
Do you want to continue to live there, or do you want to get the eviction fee and be evicted?
If they get an eviction fee to evict, the owner and the lawyer negotiate
the owner remodels and sets a new rent
and calculates how many years it will take to pay off the eviction fee.
The other two one-bed rooms got $40,000 and moved out.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#16
  • テナントフレンドリー州
  • 2023/01/11 (Wed) 10:13
  • Report

California doesn't make it easy to evict people by law.
That's why I had a tenant leave my friend's property for $30,000 after negotiations.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#18
  • 勝てるわけないでしょ
  • 2023/01/11 (Wed) 12:15
  • Report


We both sign and decide how long the contract is for
Everyone signs a month-to-month or one-year contract
I don't think they would pay for eviction. Don't they know they can evict you in six months if they go to court?

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#19
  • っh
  • 2023/01/11 (Wed) 12:21
  • Report

I was evicted in 30 days by the court. Eviction fee "0".

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#20
  • 相手による
  • 2023/01/11 (Wed) 12:59
  • Report

19

The brazen ones know that legal action can take six months or more, so they stay as long as they can.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#21
  • 感動
  • 2023/01/11 (Wed) 14:12
  • Report

The courts are busy, so the decision is immediate. No waste of taxpayer money.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#22
  • 昭和のおとっつぁん
  • 2023/01/11 (Wed) 15:08
  • Report

19
If the owner imposes unreasonable demands on the tenant after a trial
the judgment will be in favor of the tenant and the tenant will have to pay compensation.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#25
  • 昭和のおとっつぁん
  • 2023/01/12 (Thu) 06:53
  • Report

The person who got $70,000 and moved out
cannot live in the apartment because the owner is going to do seismic work
removing all of the apartment floor and putting in a steel frame for reinforcement.
Tenants are doing seismic work on the parking lot by looking at other apartments while they live there.
The owner withdrew the case and
he could live in it without any problem, as he didn't win the case to evict him in court.

Also, the tenant had to pay a part of the cost of the seismic work
but he left it alone for about 2 years, so it seems that the statute of limitations has expired and he can no longer get the money.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#26
  • 大家天国州テキサス
  • 2023/01/12 (Thu) 08:48
  • Report

In California, they can't legally kick you out right away easily.
In Texas they can kick you out in a month, but...

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#27
  • 意味不明
  • 2023/01/13 (Fri) 07:00
  • Report

There are so many different laws here.
If you have years left on your contract, you can't get kicked out immediately, but if you have a month-to-month lease, you can get out.
It depends on the city, but now it's within a few months. It's fast.
If you have rent control, you can get money. If not, you will be homeless.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#28
  • 昭和のおとっつぁん
  • 2023/01/13 (Fri) 15:49
  • Report

eviction fee is determined by the city's regulations.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#29
  • っk
  • 2023/01/13 (Fri) 16:47
  • Report

Eviction is based on the lease agreement and has nothing to do with the city. However, if it is proven that the owner cannot pay the rent due to a pandemic, the city has told the owner that he cannot be forcibly evicted, but this will be null and void on 2/1/23. Therefore, they are demonstrating on TV against forced evictions, which will begin on 2/1/23 with no mercy. If you don't pay rent, you are in violation of the contract, so eviction is justified.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#30
  • 踏み倒し
  • 2023/01/13 (Fri) 22:34
  • Report

I'm sure many landlords have been run ragged by overcharged rents. And you can't take it from people who don't pay and can't pay.
What is your story based on too?

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#31
  • 意味分からん
  • 2023/01/14 (Sat) 03:26
  • Report

In the end, what and who is right ?

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#32
  • 昭和のおとっつぁん
  • 2023/01/14 (Sat) 06:47
  • Report

29 Eviction is based on a lease agreement and has nothing to do with the city.
housing + community rent stabilization division -
investigation&enforcement

31 There are a lot of exaggerations and other posts, so in the end, see for yourself with your eyes and ears.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#33
  • 2023/01/14 (Sat) 11:58
  • Report

The rental contract is between the landlord and the renter. Vivinavi room-shelter is equivalent. Has anyone signed a contract with the City of Los Angeles ? or is the lease signed by a city official ? You will be notified of the eviction order and if you do not like it, you can fight it in court. The renter can ask the city for help here and will be referred to a free attorney. Is the renter in violation of the rental agreement ? Did you sign a lease with one resident, but there were two, or did you frequently have friends over to No visitors allowed on a room rental basis?

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#34
  • ルームレント
  • 2023/01/14 (Sat) 12:34
  • Report

Everyone is half-written, you don't have to sign a contract with the city, there is rent control, and if you violate it, you pay the landlord to rent it out. There are other laws, too.
Yes, yes, see for yourself
Some bad tenants intentionally don't pay.
Some people can get around the problem, some people are quick to sue courts and make a big deal out of it.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#35
  • 昭和のおとっつぁん
  • 2023/01/14 (Sat) 16:01
  • Report

You will be notified of the eviction order and if you disagree, you can fight it in court. In
before starting the court case, take the eviction order form to the housing + community rent stabilization division -
investigation&enforcement at City Hall for a consultation.
Renters are not referred to free attorneys for help here in the City.
If you want to find a lawyer, go to EDN and hire a lawyer

You signed a contract with one resident, but there were two, or you have a friend who frequently comes to No visitors allowed on room rent,
These things are a breach of contract and if found you can get an eviction notice. If you are found, you may be asked to give notice to vacate.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#36

知り合いの知り合いぐらい遠い話だったのではっきり覚えてないですが、覚えてる範囲で書き込ませてもらいます。
アパートを何棟か持ってる夫婦がリタイアしてメキシコに帰るのでアパートを売却したんだけど、裁判所からのオーダーで利益の何パーセントかを最後まで住んでいるテナント全員と分けることになりました。各テナントとどういう分け方をしたかまでは知りませんが、住んでいた期間とか考慮されるんじゃないですかね。
裁判所曰く、テナントが払ってきたレントのおかげで商売ができていたんだから、テナントにも利益を還元するのが当然というような判決だったみたいです。

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#37
  • 昭和のおとっさん
  • 2023/01/19 (Thu) 12:16
  • Report
  • Delete

おとっつあん、

>立ち退き命令を通知され、不服なら裁判で争えば良いでしょう。

裁判する金があったら引っ越せばいい話。
裁判してまでそこに居続けたい理由って何?
確かに引っ越しは大変だし環境も変わって不便だけど、いずれは新しい環境には慣れる。

引っ越しを機会に人生変わるかもよ?

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#38
  • 昭和のおとっつぁん
  • 2023/01/20 (Fri) 07:22
  • Report

# Why would you want to stay there until you go to court ?

There's no reason you should have to move.

People are attached to where they live.

Life is not going to change with the opportunity to move.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#40
  • 又聞き
  • 2023/01/21 (Sat) 10:46
  • Report

The story of the "Mere Old Man" is not trustworthy because the subjectivity and value of the person speaking is added on top of it and the story changes from one story to the next.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#41
  • 昭和のおとっつぁん
  • 2023/01/28 (Sat) 16:08
  • Report

It appears that the eviction deadline has been extended a bit.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

Posting period for “ Apartment eviction: 、、、、 ”  has been closed.
Please create new topic to continue the same topic.