- Sort by Category
JavaScript is turned off. You may not be able to use some services. Please turn on JavaScript.
This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)
This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)
This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)
This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)
This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)
This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)
Posting period has been closed. Please create new topic to continue the same topic.
The contradiction is that the side that is pressuring Ukraine to abandon its nuclear weapons possesses powerful nuclear weapons, and the one-sided threat structure of the strong side is problematic.
The Russian outburst has also sort of affirmed North Korea's stance, since the reality is that a small country can easily be invaded by force even in this day and age unless it has nuclear weapons.
If the world continues to ignore Russia, public opinion will turn to such a uniform color, and the world will move in the opposite direction of world peace, but there is a high probability that Ukraine will actually be abandoned.
Since Russia has not joined NATO, is not an ally, and the return to its own country is not worth it, at least military intervention is unrealistic, and economic sanctions seem to be the only way to deal with the situation.