Show all from recent

1. Murmur Plus(240kview/3561res) Free talk Yesterday 22:50
2. Moving and Disposal of Refrigerators(589view/32res) Free talk Yesterday 18:35
3. Mobil Home(599view/25res) Housing Yesterday 12:05
4. Dual nationality Passport renewal in Japan(5kview/130res) Free talk Yesterday 12:03
5. Recommended Nostalgic 1950s ~ Japanese Films of th...(1kview/45res) Entertainment Yesterday 10:24
6. Let's gather the elderly ! !(192kview/794res) Free talk 2024/09/25 09:31
7. I would like to know about English.(136view/3res) Other 2024/09/24 10:32
8. Please let us know if you have used a pet hotel or...(1kview/31res) Pet / Animal 2024/09/22 22:25
9. Corona vaccination at the time of green card acqui...(290view/2res) Visa related 2024/09/22 20:37
10. Can You Read Series(520view/16res) Learn / School 2024/09/18 12:32
Topic

U.S. Presidential Election 2020

Free talk
#1
  • 傍観だけでは終われなくなった3
  • mail
  • 2020/10/10 09:05

Here is an example of what Trump has actually done.

He has further reduced the estate tax bracket, which was only relevant to the top 0.2% of the very wealthy, and he himself has saved over $1 BILLION in taxes, and his original salary is $400,000 even though he is President without pay, so you can see what he is trying to accomplish with just one shot ?. He and his friends have also benefited greatly from the fact that he has lowered the income tax rate for large corporations and people who make over $500,000 a year.

To make up for the shortfall in revenue, he cut Medicare and food stamps, for example, and cut funding for various research programs, ignoring science. The disease control program that Obama created for things like the new coronas, Trump cut the budget and now we are in this mess.

Obamacare was just nullified with no alternative plan, and the insurance companies were left to do whatever they wanted. Those of us who already had business insurance and who were bought into the propaganda of the Republicans and their backers, the big insurance companies, that Obamacare was bad because of skyrocketing premiums, will realize how dangerous it is after this Corona.

The wall, which was originally ineffective, was built half-heartedly with taxpayer money, further increasing military spending and the national deficit, and it was a lie that Mexico was going to pay for it.

The failure of the anti-corona measures was also terrible, and in the midst of the spread of the infection, dozens of people were forced to work in meat factories by presidential decree, killing dozens of them. The forced reopening of schools and the economy is another example of putting the economy before human life.

While spouting conspiracy theories about mail-in ballot fraud, he has intentionally delayed the mail-in process by having the head of the USPS shaved down to his most ardent supporters, firing his entire executive staff, and forcing the removal of mail boxes and sorting machines. Some people died because they did not receive their medicines.

The BLM's peaceful demonstration rather defended the white supremacists and radical right who incited the riots and the Attorney General who tries to frame Antifa anyway, who of course Trump replaced with his predecessor. Furthermore, the military has even been deployed to suppress peaceful demonstrations=anti-Trump groups with unjustified arrests, tear gas attacks, and violence.

What he is doing is either to gain popularity among his supporters, or to deceive and harass his opponents for re-election, or to satisfy his desire for discrimination and revenge, or to benefit himself and his friends financially, or any of these. It is always.

Biden would have made a lot of money from his son getting favors from foreign countries. It seems like a normal possibility. But that kind of story is exactly the same thing with the Trump family. Both are self-serving blacks. Trump has been blatantly doing that kind of lobbying to collect money, and that is exactly ? what he is talking about.

Trump's Republicans would do just about anything that would please their base of Christians, gun lovers, white supremacists, etc., in addition to favoring the wealthy and big business.

Biden Democrats, like Trump, will also give some preferential treatment to big business. They are both backers. But they will also do things that will please their supporters, such as the middle class and below and labor unions. That's probably the main difference between the two.

If you want to get away from the current domination of the wealthy and have politics for the common man, you have to increase the number of politicians like Sanders, AOC, SQUAD, Katie Porter, and others. These are all Democrats who do not take donations from big business.

Also, the Democratic takeover of the Senate is essential to eliminate the blasphemers of democracy who plan to take the presidential election, a referendum, to the Supreme Court, where they are sure to win, and settle it with nine members. It is also a good idea to donate to Senate candidates in states that are likely to flip.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#2702

> No. We paid a $25 Million settlement and covered it up well. It was a pretty dirty process. Oh, so the settlement is over. Sorry, I had no idea about that.


> It is much more unreasonable for an ignorant layman to make a fuss about "proof of fraud" based only on his imagination.
Ignorance may be true, but it is not fundamental that the rules of tallying require observers from both parties ?
It is obvious that tallying without observers is a fraud, but do you believe those in charge who say this is normal ?
Instead of denying everything President Trump does, why don't you just deny it? It seems to me that instead of denying everything Trump does, you seem to be affirming everything that is anti-Trump.
If you have someone who usually judges strange behavior as okay, it's not natural to consider him strange ?


> Most cases that are just over, WSJ wrote, though. I haven't dug further than that.
So you're saying that not a single case has been confirmed in which Trump's lawyers have declared that they're dropping the case.


> correctly, "the anti-Trump vote", and that would be extremely natural ?
No, I have no idea what is extremely natural.
I understand that you topicals hate Trump, but it's not extremely natural to hate him so much that you give him
the largest number of votes in history in four years when the economy is up, unemployment is down, and we haven't had a single war.
At least for me


> You're completely switching your argument ? from talking about exposing the fraud that was happening.
I don't know if I'm switching ?
I think it's the same substance, because you're talking about getting people who passed laws that violate the Constitution to admit that there was fraud
ballots, voting methods, counting machines, software, tabulation methods, valid vote certification methods, and maybe more
A lot of fraudulent methods were used at once is what President Trump is saying, isn't it
Perhaps because it's ridiculous, I haven't read much of President Trump's claims ?


>millions The idea that you can force millions of votes to be invalidated and still win is now a complete desecration of democracy ?
From the other side, it means millions of votes were forced to be validated
If that were the case, you would try hard to invalidate them ?
.

> Then please give me objective evidence, evidence that at least gives me a small "chance of being right".
This is a tough one.
On the contrary, what would make you feel even the slightest "possibility of being right" ??

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#2703

> so many methods of fraud were used at once
how is it possible that so many methods were used to commit a perfect crime without a single piece of clear evidence
and how do you explain why Trump's campaign's trial policy shifted to how each state voted instead of exposing fraud ?
After all, it is Trump's side that is trying to twist the election results with power and pressure!

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#2704
  • 昭和のおとっつぁん
  • 2020/12/10 (Thu) 17:40
  • Report

If we don't get something definitive tomorrow, maybe we'll settle on Biden on Monday.
What happened to the server seized in Frankfurt, Germany ??

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#2705
  • 傍観だけでは終われなくなった3
  • 2020/12/10 (Thu) 18:50
  • Report

> It's obvious that counting the votes without a monitor is a dishonest act
You've been assured of this, but have you really checked for yourself ? For someone who said we should suspect various possibilities, aren't you just taking the word of the backroom media ?

? You said it was evidence of fraud, but there have been no arrests of poll workers ? ? Furthermore, based on the explanation of the person in charge of the site and the fact that it was not admitted as evidence in the lawsuit, I would think that ? there is something wrong with that .

And then I would think, for example, "there is no problem in the rules to tally without a monitor ?. It may vary from state to state, and I haven't done any serious digging, so this is just my guess.

I've seen some rules about how the watcher can be monitored, but I haven't seen any rules that say you absolutely have to be monitored, and isn't it possible that the stance is that if you want to be monitored, feel free to be ? otherwise, for example, if the watcher I mean, you could intentionally delay the vote counting process by people deliberately not going ?

> You mean you haven't seen a single case where the Trump lawyers have declared that they are dropping the lawsuit, right?
No, I saw an article in the WSJ, the right media on the front page, that most of the cases are already over.

> It's not quite natural. At least for me
Yes, it's certainly a matter of personal opinion, and neither of us can say which is the right answer. But since you used the word "strange" first, I objected to it as a difference of opinion.

Note that you were appealing to emotionalism to say that the current voting results are impossible, but I had previously written that I was shocked by the number of votes Trump received, but I never said it was impossible. Which is stubbornly denying the results ?

> that many fraudulent methods were used at once is what Trump is saying
That kind of stuff has already been dismissed in various states.

> I think it's the same substance, because he's asking for recognition of the injustice of people passing laws that violate the Constitution,
a method that was also passed in Republican dominated state legislatures. It's not like they didn't agree with it and appealed to the feds. And some of them were enacted a year ago. Is it the same substance to sue other states for unconstitutionality under the guise of interpreting the Constitution and using the power of judges in your favor because you lost an election that you knew about before the election ? ?

The moment you say this, it just sounds like opportunism, where anything goes if you can win. I can't hear it.

> What would make you feel that there is any "possibility of being right" ?
If you have any rebuttal to my argument that makes you feel that I have a point, please do.

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

#2706
  • 昭和のおとっつぁん
  • 2020/12/10 (Thu) 19:30
  • Report

Frankfurt ?

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/f2faf71f5d583a99de4ad10d061db24fa86b571a

This text has been translated by auto-translation. There may be a slight difference between the original text and the translation. (Original Language: 日本語)

Posting period for “ U.S. Presidential Election 2020 ”  has been closed.
Please create new topic to continue the same topic.